Pittman v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRITT, District Judge.
Before the court are (1) defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and (2) plaintiffs appeal from the Magistrate Judge’s order filed 24 October 1994 denying, in part, plaintiffs motion to compel. Plaintiff responded to defendant’s motion, and defendant replied. 1 The issues have been fully briefed and the matter is now ripe for disposition. The court finds a hearing in this matter is not necessary as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff is the daughter of decedents, Marjorie T. Arnold…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Ethyl Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Gregory v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John Michael Wheeler, Independent of the Estate of Elmore K. Melton, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Estate of Rose D'ambrosio, Deceased, Vita D'Ambrosio v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Estate of D'Ambrosio v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
- Estate Rose v. Commissioner IRSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Estate of D'Ambrosio v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.