Legal Opinion

Gouert v. Mechanics & Metals National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to marshal the assets of Stoppani & Hotchkin.

1Opinion of the CourtNewburger, J.

In February, 1910, the defendantsStoppani & Hotchkin executed a general collateral agreement with the defendant the Mechanics and Metals National Bank whereby the said firm agreed from time to time to deposit certain securities as- collateral for loans to be made to them by the bank. The firm from time to time borrowed certain sums, of money and deposited certain bonds and stocks as collateral security. On the 18th day of May, 1914, the firm of Stoppani & Hotchkin failed, and made a general assignment to Abraham S. Gilbert for the benefit of their creditors, and at which time they were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gouert v. Mechanics & Metals National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API