United States v. Piolunek
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WIEDIE, Judge:
The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of knowing and wrongful possession of visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; knowing and wrongful receipt of visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; enticing a minor child to send sexually explicit images; and communicating indecent language to a minor, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The members sentenced the appellant to a dishonorable…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. OzbirnUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. Sergeant MARCUS C. DOSHIERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015