Legal Opinion

United States v. Piolunek

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 21, 2013No. ACM 38099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WIEDIE, Judge:

The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of knowing and wrongful possession of visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; knowing and wrongful receipt of visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; enticing a minor child to send sexually explicit images; and communicating indecent language to a minor, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The members sentenced the appellant to a dishonorable…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. OzbirnUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  3. United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  4. United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  5. United States v. Sergeant MARCUS C. DOSHIERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API