Legal Opinion

In re Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1935Published

1Dissent

O’Malley, J. (dissenting).

The discretion vested in the court under the provisions of section 475 of the Judiciary Law and section 1492 of the Civil Practice Act seems to us to have been properly exercised. The appellant attorney opposed sending the matter to an official referee and thus avoiding payment of fees. The respond- , ent asked specifically that the matter be referred to an official referee.

In the case of Ward v. Ward (67 App. Div. 121), relied upon by the appellant, all costs were imposed upon the successful party.

In Couch v. Millard (41 Hun, 212) costs were awarded to both parties…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API