Legal Opinion

Herold v. Wills

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

In this stockholder’s derivative action the corporate defendant for whose benefit the, action is brought moves to vacate the service of the summons and complaint upon it. The individual defendants apply for an extension of time to answer or move with respect to the complaint, predicated in the alternate on the granting or denial of the motion to vacate service made by the corporate defendant.

The individual defendants have heretofore moved to dismiss the complaint because of the asserted unreasonable neglect to serve a summons on the corporation, an indispensable defendant. On that motion the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorne v. BrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Hexter v. Day-Elder Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Lissauer v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jay's Stores, Inc. v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API