Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Rudeseal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1937No. 25624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

1. Actual delivery to the grantee of personal property sold is not essential to the passage of the title, where the property is sold under a written bill of sale passing the *211title. Nolley v. Elliott, 50 Ga. App. 382 (178 S. E. 309); Burney v. Ball, 24 Ga. 505 (3). A bill of sale to personalty, whereby the grantor, for a recited valuable monetary consideration, does “grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto” the grantee named, all of the described personalty, although the property is not actually delivered to the grantee, passes title to the property to the grantee.. Although the bill of sale was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parrott v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Burney v. BallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  3. Goodwyn v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  4. Hall v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Beard v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meeks v. Adams Louisiana Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
  2. Padgett v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Padgett v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API