Legal Opinion

Microtek Medical, Inc. v. 3M Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2006No. 2005-CA-01860-SCTPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

942 So.2d 122 (2006)

MICROTEK MEDICAL, INC.

v.

3M COMPANY.

No. 2005-CA-01860-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 5, 2006.

Brenda B. Bethany, Jackson, C. Michael Ellingburg, attorneys for appellant.

Melody McAnally, W. Wayne Drinkwater, Jr., Jackson, attorneys for appellee.

EN BANC.

CARLSON, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. The 3M Company sued Microtek Medical, Inc. for indemnification of attorneys' fees incurred by 3M in defending a personal injury suit in Pennsylvania. The Chancery Court of Lowndes County, Mississippi, granted summary judgment in favor of 3M and awarded 3M in excess of $223,000 in…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Cotton v. McConnellMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bredemeier v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Upchurch Plumbing, Inc. v. Greenwood Utilities CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  3. GuideOne Elite Insurance Co. v. Mount Carmel MinistriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Edinburg SRGV, LLC v. Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
  5. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. TCA Cable PartnersCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API