Legal Opinion

Smith v. Akers

Richmond County Circuit Court

Decided October 12, 1990No. Case No. LR-2775-3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE RANDALL G. JOHNSON

This case is before the court to determine the sufficiency of a garnishee’s answer to a garnishment summons. At issue is whether funds held by the garnishee are reachable by the judgment creditor notwithstanding the garnishee’s claim that it has a perfected security interest in, as well as a common law and contractual right to set-off against, those funds.

For purposes of this opinion, the relevant facts1 are that on September 9, 1988, Premnet Consulting,, Ltd., one of the judgment debtors herein, obtained a revolving line of credit in the amount of $75,000 from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. State & City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  2. Farmers' State Bank v. Van HoutenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Killette v. Raemell's Sewing Apparel, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Baltimore & Associates, Inc. v. Municipal Escrow & Title Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  5. Holloway v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tillman v. Fairfax Bank & Trust Co.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API