In re the Estate of Bobula
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.
By a prior decree in these two estate proceedings that is not before us for review, the Surrogate determined that the decedents (husband and wife) died simultaneously on August 28, 1964. Thereafter the respective representatives of the estates submitted a controversy to the Surrogate upon an agreed statement of facts (CPLR 3222). The dispute centered upon the ownership of 10 separately described assets of real and personal property. The determination of the Surrogate (45 Misc 2d 745) is not questioned as to seven items, but one or both estate representatives present for review the correctness…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. ParnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Yiatchos v. YiatchosSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johansen v. PeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In re the Estate of PinnockNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- Kempaner v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Bumbolo v. Faxton St. Luke's HealthcareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Estate of Racca v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.