Legal Opinion

Susan Nielen-Thomas v. Concorde Investment Services

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 24, 2019No. 18-2875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Flaum, Circuit Judge.

*526 Susan Nielen-Thomas, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, filed a complaint in Wisconsin state court alleging she and other class members were defrauded by their investment advisor. Defendants removed the case to federal court. They then argued the action should be dismissed because it was a "covered class action" precluded by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 ("SLUSA"). See 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(1), (f)(5)(B), amending Securities Exchange Act of 1934. According to Nielen-Thomas, her lawsuit did not meet SLUSA's "covered class action"…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael ChaparroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. James Hulce v. Zipongo Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  3. Portell v. ZayedDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. John J. Petr v. BMO Harris Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. CF Entertainment, Inc. v. The Nielsen Company (US), LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API