Legal Opinion

Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1984No. Nos. 82-3251, 82-3363, 82-3364 and 82-3385PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Petitioners seek review of an Interstate Commerce Commission decision removing certain protective conditions imposed on railroad mergers by the Commission during the past sixty years. We have jurisdiction to hear this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2342.

An understanding of this case requires some knowledge about the railroad merger process. Railroads wishing to consolidate must obtain permission from the Interstate Commerce Commission. 49 U.S.C. § 11343(a) (1983). The Commission must approve their merger request if it finds the merger to be in the public…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ICCSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Argo-Collier Truck Lines Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. Regular Common Carrier Conference v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API