Legal Opinion

In re Babigian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1999Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was suspended for a period of six months by decision dated February 26, 1998 (247 AD2d 817, lv denied 91 NY2d 813, rearg denied 92 NY2d 877, cert denied 525 US 1003). He now applies for reinstatement to practice.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny the application for reinstatement. In addition to the information already provided by respondent, he may renew his application by submission of documentation showing payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BabigianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API