Legal Opinion

Bouchard v. Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 5, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On motion for new trial by defendant. This is an action on a fire insurance policy issued on plaintiff’s buildings and personal property. The property was destroyed by fire on the 28th day of November, 1912. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $1534.63, and the defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

This is an action on a fire insurance policy issued August 22, 1911, on the plaintiff’s buildings and personal property. The property was destroyed by fire on the 28th day of November, 1912. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1534.63, and the case is before the court on the defendant’s general motion for a new trial.

At the first trial of this case the presiding Justice ordered a non-suit, and the plaintiff excepted. The exceptions were sustained. The issue in the former trial was “whether the fact that the fire was caused by the operation of a gasoline engine by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Rideout v. Winnebago Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Putt v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Davis v. Western Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  2. Global Investors Agent Corp. v. National Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Blanchard v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  4. Meloon v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  5. Stinson v. Davol, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API