Baumbach v. Dickens
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
The judgment under review is one denying a motion for a new trial in a proceeding to probate in solemn form the alleged will of Helen Dickens, wherein the jury returned a verdict in favor of the caveators and a judgment was entered denying probate.
The sole ground of the caveat filed by the heirs of Helen Dickens was that she did not sign or execute the document propounded as her will, and that which purports to be her signature on the document was and is a forgery. The paper offered as her will purports to have been signed by “Mrs. Helen Dickens” and witnessed by Della…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- King v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Brinson v. FairclothSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heard v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Cantrell v. RED WING ROLLERWAY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Distribution Concepts Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996