Legal Opinion

Pelous v. Guidry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1987No. 86-1106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YELVERTON, Judge.

Plaintiff, Sheryl Pelous, appeals a judgment finding that her employment injury was not the cause of her disability, and denying her claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm.

Sheryl Pelous was employed by N.A.D. Brokerage Company as a counter. N.A.D. was in the business of manufacturing crab and crawfish traps. Sheryl counted craw-fish and crab traps as they were delivered to N.A.D., which was owned by Euline Guidry, the wife of Leo Guidry. To load and unload the traps from the trucks, the employees used a staircase ladder.

On December 15, 1982, while attempting to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thum v. MRO Services Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. Halliburton Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Martin v. Red Simpson, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API