Legal Opinion

Limbaugh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 2004No. 4D03-4973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

887 So.2d 387 (2004)

Rush LIMBAUGH, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 4D03-4973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 6, 2004.

Order Denying Rehearing and Certifying Question November 17, 2004.

Roy Black, Jackie Perczek and Christine Ng of Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.

Barry Krischer, State Attorney for the Fifteenth Circuit, and James L. Martz, Assistant State Attorney, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Mary E. Baluss, Washington, D.C., and Brian A. Kahan of Kahan & Associates, P.L., Boca Raton, for Amici Curiae National…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Per curiam.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Farrall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. State v. CrumbleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Duckworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Freeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API