Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Mutual Grocery Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

These causes were tried together; and the District Court judge, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment in each in favor of the plaintiffs. The gravamen of each state of demand is a breach of the duty resting upon defendant corporation to maintain its store premises in the city of Plainfield in a reasonably safe condition, in consequence of which, the plaintiffs, Jane Coyne and Margaret B. Whitley, while in the store by invitation, fell and suffered personal injuries. Specifically, the charge was a dangerous condition resulting from a…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Merkel v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Simpson v. DuffyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Christine v. Mutual Grocery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. Gill v. KrassnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API