S.E. Lux Jr. Mercantile Company v. Jones
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Separate suits were brought by appellees against appellant, which were by consent consolidated and tried before the court, without the intervention of a jury, as a single suit. The trial court made an elaborate finding of fact, which states the issues, and from which we copy as follows:
The S. E. Lux Jr. Mercantile Company operates a mercantile business in Topeka, Kansas, and in that-connection buys and sells canned tomatoes in carload lots. On March 30, 1927, the mercantile company purchased 5,000 cases of canned tomatoes from H. H. Wampler, trading as the Fort .Smith Canning Company, by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whitmore v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Belding v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Craig v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- White v. Beal & Fletcher Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Dudley E. Jones Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howell v. Thew Shovel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932