Legal Opinion
Bensen v. Gall
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 7, 1992No. 90-466PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This is the second time that the events giving rise to this controversy have been before the Court. In Colony Park Assocs. v. Gall, 154 Vt. 1, 572 A.2d 891 (1990), we affirmed an award of specific performance of a contract for the sale of land by defendants to Colony Park Associates (Colony Park). Plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action seeking a commission for the sale. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants because plaintiff did not have a written listing agreement as required by Rule 2.11 of the Vermont Real Estate Commission. On appeal, plaintiff argues that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Thornton Real Estate, Inc. v. LobdellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Berisha v. HardySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Currier v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Finlay Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. PainoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hunter Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Lang McLaughry Spera Real Estate, LLC v. HinsdaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- UHAR & COMPANY, INC. v. JacobDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re Capitol Hill GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- In Re Capitol Hill GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.