Legal Opinion
Kargen v. Kerr
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 24, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
248 N.J. Super. 91 (1991)
590 A.2d 255
ROBERT A. KARGEN AND RENEE A. KARGEN, H/W, AND FRANCES G. FORWOOD AND CAROLYN FORWOOD, H/W, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
H. BRAD KERR AND SARAH JANE KERR, H/W, AND STEPHEN R. SIGNORE, JR., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Cape May County.
Decided January 24, 1991.
Harold G. Cohen for plaintiffs (Lesser & Kaplin, attorneys).
William J. Bryers for defendants (Bryers & Bryers, attorneys).
CALLINAN, J.S.C.
The question presented by this case is the effect of the failure of a realtor to include the address of a buyer in a contract for sale of realty, given…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor BoardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- STATE BY VAN RIPER v. Atlantic City Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- New Jersey Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- City of East Orange v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor BoardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peterson v. Estate of PursellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Romano v. ChapmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Gordon Development Group, Inc. v. BradleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- JOHN C. SULLIVAN VS. MAX SPANN REAL ESTATE & AUCTION CO. (L-1036-17, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020