Legal Opinion

Allen v. Sheipline, Commrs.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1934No. 103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GUERNSEY, J.

At the time the contract referred to in the petition was entered into, there were in effect §§5660 and 5661 GC, the pertinent parts of which read as follows:

“Sec 5660 GC. The commissioners of a county * '' - shall not enter into any contract, agreement or obligation involving the expenditure of money, or pass any resolution or order for the appropi-iation or expenditure of money, unless the auditor 4 * thereof, * * first certifies that the money required for the payment of such obligation or appropriation is in the treasury to the credit of the fund from which it is to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Village of Waynesville, Ca2007-03-039 (2-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. McMichael v. Van HoPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1966
  3. Smith v. Village of Waynesville, Ca2007-03-039 (12-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API