Legal Opinion

Watson v. Village of Sibley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1939No. 25341. Judgment and decree affirmedPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wilson

The plaintiffs, Emily S. Watson and three others, trustees of the estate of Hiram Sibley, deceased, on January 11, 1934, filed a petition in the circuit court of Ford county seeking the disconnection of a parcel of real estate owned by them from the limits of the village of Sibley. Their petition was filed conformably to the provisions of the Disconnection act of 1933, (Laws of 1933, p. 220,) subsequently held unconstitutional. (Forsythe v. Village of Cooksville, 356 Ill. 289.) The cause proceeded to the point of preparing an order in favor of the plaintiffs, as directed by the court. March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Edgar v. National Box Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Forsythe v. Village of CooksvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. People ex rel. CalvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wabash Railroad v. People ex rel. FunkIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hayward v. People ex rel. ButlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamer v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. People Ex Rel. Siekmann v. Pennsylvania RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Raines v. County of GreeneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API