Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1951No. 32595Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The authority of the Public Utilities Commission to entertain and determine a matter of this kind is conferred by Section 614-3, General Code, which recites in part:

“The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio is hereby vested with the power and jurisdiction * * # to promulgate and enforce all orders relating to the protection, welfare and safety of railroad employees and the traveling public. ’ ’

And in the case of New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 130 Ohio St., 548, 200 N. E., 759, it was held in the first paragraph of the syllabus:

“The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Akron & Barberton Belt Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Co-Operative Legislative Committee of the Transportation Brotherhoods v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API