Legal Opinion

Ah Hing v. Ah On

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EXCEPTIONS FROM CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST CIRCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

This action for false imprisonment, in which judgment was. rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $100, conies here on defendant’s exceptions, upon only two of the points raised by which he now relies.

1. That his motion to open the default was disallowed. Aside from the question whether the trial Judge rightly denied this motion on the ground that another Judge had previously denied it, there do not appear to have been any merits in the motion.

2. That, though in' default, he was entitled to a trial or-hearing before a jury on the assessment of damages.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Kearney v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Baird v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Sheets v. BrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Lii v. Sida of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  3. First Trust Co. v. CabrinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Seong v. Trans-Pacific Airlines, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ward v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API