Alpharma Inc v. Leavitt, Michael
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This is the second time we have heard an appeal in this matter. In our first *3opinion, we concluded that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had failed to adequately explain why it granted Philips Roxane, Inc.’s “new animal drug application” for bacitracin zinc.1 See A.L. Phar-ma, Inc. v. Shalala, 62 F.3d 1484, 1486 (D.C.Cir.1995). In this opinion, we conclude that the explanation the FDA offered on remand adequately addressed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troy Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Stuttering Found. of America v. SpringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Menkes v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.