Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hitt v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1928No. 26896Published

1Concurrence

I concur in the majority opinion upon one ground alone, namely, that the judgment appealed from was a judgment of the circuit court, a court of competent jurisdiction, where appellant received a fair and impartial trial by a court presided over by a disinterested judge; in other words, a court which furnished appellant due process.

I cannot give my assent to the other grounds upon which the majority opinion places the decision of the court. Under the Tumey case, I can see no escape from the conclusion that justices of the peace of this state, sitting for the trial of misdemeanors, are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Ex parte MeeksDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API