Legal Opinion
Musquiz v. City of Huntington Park
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1986No. B009327PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
The appellant, Musquiz, appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for alternative or peremptory writ of mandate and damages brought pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Musquiz raises three central issues on appeal. First, did the respondent, Huntington Park City Council, exceed the proper scope of review during its examination of the findings and recommendations of the city’s civil service commission? Second, was the council’s decision supported by its findings? Third, did the trial court apply the appropriate standard of review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ng v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Guardians of Turlock's Integrity v. Turlock City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Fleming v. Safeco InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Jackson v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henry v. Alcove Investment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Riveros v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Shor v. Department of Social ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990