Legal Opinion

Dunderdale v. Westinghouse Electric Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 11, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Memorandum.—Garnishment. Appeal from an order quashing a writ entered by the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jonas Hutchinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October, term, 1893, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr: Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a proceeding by way of garnishment, based upon a judgment against appellant, on which an execution was issued, and on the same day was, by order of the attorney of the plaintiff indorsed thereon, returned “ no property found and no part satisfied.”

We regard the statute relative to the filing of creditors’ bills and that concerning the issue of garnishee process upon the return of an execution “Bo property found,” as so similar that the rule as to the return of execution in one case is to be applied to the other.

We have already…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chanute v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. KeohaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Dennison v. BlumenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Scheubert v. HonelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Pecos Irrigation & Improvement Co. v. Olson ex rel. MonthanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Kelly v. MarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  4. Clark v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API