Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Greater New York Housing Development Fund Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 20, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment entered April 30, 2001 (Rolando T. Acosta, J., and jury) modified to vacate the awards for past and future pain and suffering, and the matter remanded for a new trial solely as to damages for past and future pain and suffering, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiff, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, stipulates to decrease the award for past pain and suffering to $150,000 and decrease the award for future pain and suffering to $225,000 and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.
A fair…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Belcastro v. Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District Number 14Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Murtha v. Integral Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Salazar v. B.R. Fries & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Mane v. BruscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.