Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hooper

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1984No. 82-675PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon consideration of the petition, brief of petitioner, and the State's brief in opposition thereto, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 453 So.2d 1066, granting the State of Alabama's petition for mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded for an order consistent herewith.

Mandamus will not lie to compel the trial court's exercise of discretion in a particular manner, nor to review the lower court's proceedings for error, nor as a substitute for appeal.State v. Cannon, 369 So.2d 32 (Ala. 1978).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, BEATTY and…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. State v. WatersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Ex parte State of Alabama.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. State v. BlueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. State v. SidesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API