Legal Opinion

Loucks v. Austin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1926No. 1367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P otteb, Chief Justice.

This cause has been submitted upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, the motion stating as grounds that there is no bill of exceptions in the case and that there was no motion for new trial filed or presented to the district court and no order overruling such motion, and that therefore there is nothing presented to this court by the petition or record herein.

The statement of the grounds is preceded by the assertion that the finding and decision attempted to be ap pealed from was the determination of an issue of fact. But we find upon examination of the record…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seibel v. BathWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bank of Chadron v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Downing v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Fitzpatrick v. RoganWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Schmidt v. First National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Coulthard v. CossairtWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stein v. SchunemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Board of County Com'rs. v. BrewerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Coulthard v. CossairtWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API