Betsch v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Petitioner challenges an order of the Board of Parole. Because he did not exhaust his administrative remedies under ORS 144.335(1), we lack jurisdiction to review the order.
Petitioner argues that he should not be held to the requirement that he exhaust his administrative remedies, because the Board did not comply with ORS 183.413(2)(i)1 and inform him that he was required to request administrative review as a prerequisite to judicial review.
The crux of petitioner’s challenge to the Board’s order is that a special condition of his parole, that he stay out of Klamath County, is…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Garcia v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991