Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. On the 28th of January, 1896, the plaintiff in error entered á train of cars of Ihe defendant, at its depot in Hoboken, with intent to travel in it to Mount Arlington, in Morris county. He was provided with a “ commutation ticket,” which stated that it entitled T. O. Bullock to sixty rides on continuous trains between Mount Arlington and Hoboken during the month of January, subject to the conditions on its back, to be signed by Bullock.

Read the full summary

On error to the Supreme Court. On the 28th of January, 1896, the plaintiff in error entered á train of cars of Ihe defendant, at its depot in Hoboken, with intent to travel in it to Mount Arlington, in Morris county. He was provided with a “ commutation ticket,” which stated that it entitled T. O. Bullock to sixty rides on continuous trains between Mount Arlington and Hoboken during the month of January, subject to the conditions on its back, to be signed by Bullock. Those conditions were in form of an agreement, in consideration1 of' reduced fare, that Bullock would conform to all rules and…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

The Chancellor.

The plaintiff in error questions the correctness of the charge of the trial judge, both because of its declarations as to his rights under his contract for passage, and because of its instruction to the jury that exemplary damages could not be awarded.

It is unnecessary to deal with the first class of objections. Through the determination of the trial court that the defendant wrongly proceeded in taking the packages from the plaintiff, recovery was permitted which is fully compensatory of all injury suffered by the plaintiff, whatever his…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tiberi v. PetrellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Cone v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Druskin v. T. A. Gillespie Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. J. P. Hudson & Sons v. Uncle Sam Planting & Manufacturing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API