Legal Opinion

O'Day v. Ambaum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1907No. 6851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered February 25, 1907, upon sustaining defendants’ objection to the introduction of evidence, dismissing an action to enjoin the conveyance of real estate.

1Opinion of the CourtChow, J.

This action was commenced by M. O’Day and the Title Guaranty & Surety Com pany, a corporation, against Jacob Ambaum, Frank Conrad, Harry Wakes, Charlotte Wakes, his wife, and Charlotte La Croix, to enjoin the conveyance of certain real estate. The plaintiffs allege that on April 1, 1906, the defendant Jacob Ambaum entei’ed into a contract with King county to construct a certain wagon road; that he as principal and the plaintiffs as sureties executed and delivered to King county a bond for the faithful performance of his contract; that about May 1, 1906, defendant Ambaum formed a partnership…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Wiggins v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
  3. Washington v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Shufeldt v. BoehmIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Uhl v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hamilton v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Perkins v. BundyIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Allen v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bank of Sanborn v. FranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API