Legal Opinion

M. R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 26, 1981No. 80-247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

We affirm the adjudication of delinquency for burglary and grand theft upon a holding that in this case where the identity of the perpetrator was the sole disputed issue (1) the evidence that the juvenile’s fingerprint was found on the inner surface of a jalousie window slat at the break-in point of a private residence with which the juvenile had no prior contact or relation was, viewed in a light most favorable to the State, see Codie v. State, 313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975); Everett v. State, 339 So.2d 704 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), sufficient to establish that the print was made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. State v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Codie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Tirko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Ivey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sorey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Rosario v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Belvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. D.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API