M. R. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.
We affirm the adjudication of delinquency for burglary and grand theft upon a holding that in this case where the identity of the perpetrator was the sole disputed issue (1) the evidence that the juvenile’s fingerprint was found on the inner surface of a jalousie window slat at the break-in point of a private residence with which the juvenile had no prior contact or relation was, viewed in a light most favorable to the State, see Codie v. State, 313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975); Everett v. State, 339 So.2d 704 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), sufficient to establish that the print was made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- State v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Codie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Tirko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Ivey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sorey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Rosario v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Belvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- D.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.