Legal Opinion

United States v. James Kaylor, Willie Glen Hopkins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 11, 1974No. 1048, Docket 73-1530PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

Following a divided panel opinion in this case filed October 15, 1973, rehearing en banc was ordered. The principal question presented is whether the trial court must make an affirmative explicit finding that a youth offender 1 will not “derive benefit from treatment” under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (Act), 18 U.S.C. § 5010(d). 2 A majority of the panel which decided this case held, in reference to appellant Hopkins, that an implicit finding was sufficient, the majority relying primarily upon Cox v. United States, 473 F.2d 334, 337 (4th Cir. 1973) (en banc), and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lyman T. Shepard v. Larry Taylor, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, and Maurice Sigler, Chairman, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Linda H. SchwarzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Henry O. Boyd, Sr. v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. James L. Cobbs v. Carl Robinson, Warden, Connecticut State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API