Legal Opinion

Moore & Sinott v. Watson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 29, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Eeplevin.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

This is replevin to recover certain liquors, of the alleged value of $682.28, from the defendant.

The facts in the case are these: In 1895, one Albert M. Williams was employed by the plaintiffs as a traveling salesman, and in July .of that year he sold to the defendant, for them, the liquors in question. After taking the order for the goods, and before making the sale, he mailed the order to the plaintiffs who, after looking up the financial standing of the defendant, notified Williams that they declined to fill the order. Thereupon, after some conference with the defendant, and upon being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Mosler ex rel. WarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hunt v. StrewMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vineberg v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
  2. Willis v. BurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Koppers Coal Co. v. Dixie Fire Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API