Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Atlanta v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1990No. S90G0957Published

1DissentFletcher, Justice

“Statutes requiring the letting of contracts to the lowest bidder are designed for the benefit and protection of the public, and not that of the bidders.” Peeples v. Byrd, 98 Ga. 688, 692 (3) (25 SE 677) (1896). Consequently, in resolving the issues presented in a case such as this, the lodestar is the interest of the public and not that of an aggrieved, unsuccessful bidder.

The letting of public works contracts through a competitive bidding process has essentially two objectives: First, it is intended to ensure that public works projects will be constructed by a qualified or responsible…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilton Constuction Co. v. Rockdale County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Garrison v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Peeples v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Gostovich v. City of West RichlandWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Manly Building Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API