Legal Opinion

In Re Yahne

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1924No. Crim. No. 2656PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the conclusion of the oral argument in the above-entitled matter the Chief Justice made the following statement:

[1] The Chief Justice: The justices are all satisfied that the complaint upon which the petitioner is held, as shown by the return, states a public offense, and that the question of whether or not the petitioner was guilty or innocent of that offense is the question counsel is now presenting to the court in his effort to show that the petitioner was engaged in interstate commerce and that an attempted prohibition of that interstate commerce was a violation of the interstate…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Isett v. FreesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Lindenberg v. BrodekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. McKenzie v. Santa Fe Trail StagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API