Legal Opinion
In re: Artem Koshkalda
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2020No. NC-19-1235-BTaF NC-19-1255-BTaFUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
FILED MAY 26 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP Nos. NC-19-1235-BTaF NC-19-1255-BTaF ARTEM KOSHKALDA, (Cross Appeals) Debtor. Bk. No. 18-30016-HLB ARTEM KOSHKALDA, Adv. No. 18-03020-HLB Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MEMORANDUM* SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION; EPSON AMERICA, INC., Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Argued and Submitted on March 26, 2020 Filed – May 26, 2020 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California * This disposition is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- U. S. Bank N. A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Retz v. Samson (In Re Retz)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Robert P. Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.