Legal Opinion

Mursau Corp. v. Florida Penn Oil & Gas, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-1759PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

Presently before us are Motions for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of each Defendant. Having held oral argument and having reviewed the affidavits, depositions, briefs and other exhibits filed, we find no genuine issue as to any material fact. Consequently, we will grant these motions.

Facts

Plaintiff, Mursau Corporation (“Mursau”), through its President and majority stockholder, Thomas H. Murray, Esquire (“Murray”), purchased a limited partnership interest in Defendant Florida-Penn Oil & Gas, Inc.’s (“Fla-Penn”) 1981-102 Drilling Program (“102 program”). Defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  3. In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Leonard v. Shearson Lehman/American Express Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Wood & Locker, Inc. v. Doran and AssociatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Berk v. Ascott Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Armbrustmacher v. Redburn (In Re Redburn)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API