Legal Opinion
Rochdale Village, Inc. v. Finance Administrator
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 5, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that certain real property qualifies for a partial real estate tax exemption pursuant to Private Housing Finance Law § 33, and two proceedings pursuant to RPTL article 7 challenging the assessment of certain real property as excessive for the 1985/1986 and 1986/1987 tax years, (1) Rochdale Village, Inc., appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated June 16, 1988, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to dismiss the action upon the ground that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Hewlett Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Stabile v. Half Hollow Hills Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Twenty First Point Co. v. Town of GuilderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cathedral Fourth Development Corp. v. Board of Assessors & the Assessment Review CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Laurel Hill Farms, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008