Legal Opinion

Carey-Reed Company v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Creal, Commissioner—

Affirming.

Charles L. Hart instituted this action against the city of Princeton, E. B. Black, and N. T. Yeatch, partners doing business under the firm name of Black & Yeatch, R. B. Reeves, individually and as agent of Black & Yeatch, and Carey-Reed Company, a corporation, asking for damages for injury to a tractor and for the loss of the use of same; it being alleged that it was taken and used without his knowledge or consent.

At the close of the evidence, the jury at the direc tion of the court, upon motion of the city and of Black & Yeatch, returned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephenson's Administratrix v. Sharp's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Powell v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Seaboard Oil Co. v. HuntsmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Kentucky Glycerine Co. v. Woodruff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Wright v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wedding v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. R. B. Tyler Co. v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Paducah Dry Goods Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API