Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos Roman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2019No. 17-3582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Carlos Roman challenges his Sentencing Guidelines classification as a career offender. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Specifically, Roman argues that his conviction for aggravated battery on a public way in Illinois is not a crime of violence. See id . § 4B1.2(a). We disagree and affirm.

I. Background

Roman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Roman's presentence investigation report (PSR) classified him as a career offender. 1 At sentencing, Roman opposed the career offender classification, arguing that his 2012 Illinois conviction for aggravated battery on a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Michael Hill v. Robert WerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Donte KentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Zacharia ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Green v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
  4. United States v. Richard Ingram, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API