United States v. Carlos Roman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Carlos Roman challenges his Sentencing Guidelines classification as a career offender. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Specifically, Roman argues that his conviction for aggravated battery on a public way in Illinois is not a crime of violence. See id . § 4B1.2(a). We disagree and affirm.
I. Background
Roman pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Roman's presentence investigation report (PSR) classified him as a career offender. 1 At sentencing, Roman opposed the career offender classification, arguing that his 2012 Illinois conviction for aggravated battery on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Hill v. Robert WerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Donte KentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Zacharia ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Green v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- United States v. Richard Ingram, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020