Indian Refining Co. v. Buhrman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the. District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here on writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court, Southern District of New York, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant in error, who was plaintiff below: The action was brought to recover salary as assistant treasurer of defendant from March 1 to September IS, 1912.
1Opinion of the Court
RACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
Buhrman was appointed to his position on November 15, 1911, by the board of directors, to serve until his successor was appointed. The fixing of his salary was left to the president of the company, and was fixed by him at $7,000 per annum. The by-laws invested the board of directors with the powers of the. corporation, including the power to remove officers. There was an executive committee, authorized by the board to exercise all the powers of the board when the latter was not in session. Mr. Pomeroy was the treasurer and one of the members of the executive committee.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Franciscan Hotel Co. v. Albuquerque Hotel Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Duplex Envelope Co. v. Denominational Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Thermopolis Northwest Electric Co. v. IrelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Murphy v. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Interstate Realty Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.