Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Harris

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1957Published

1Dissent

Van- Voorhis, J. (dissenting in part).

The retroactive commutation of the annuity belonging to decedent’s second husband is contrary to law, in my opinion, and deprives him of property without due process of law in violation of the Federal and State Constitutions. It has previously been held that by means of an inter vivos trust and the exercise by will of a reserved power of appointment, the late Jean Ferris d’Espinay established a valid annuity of $25,000 for the benefit of her husband, commencing upon her death September 19, 1941. The estate of Mrs. d ’Espinay has been involved in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Kearney v. . CruikshankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. People's Trust Co. v. . FlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Central Trust Co. v. FalckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Dunham v. . DeraismesNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API