Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1940No. 4 Div. 61Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, Justice.

The rule adverted to from the case of Pope v. State, 168 Ala. 33, 53 So. 292, was not departed from in Oliver v. State, 232 Ala. 5, 166 So. 615, 617. Each case is judged by its particular facts. In the Oliver case, supra, the coroner was active in investigating the facts of the homicide and testified at the trial. Such official should not have been permitted by the sheriff to have had charge of the jury and “to remain with them during much of their deliberation.” No such circumstances existed in the instant case. An officer is not rendered incompetent as a witness…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Sparrenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. United States v. ReedU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1852

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API