Legal Opinion

Fedmet Trading Corp. v. Ekco International Trade Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Karla Moskowitz, J.

Plaintiff, Fedmet Trading Corp. (Fedmet), moves after trial, *928pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) to modify this court’s September 11, 1990 decision awarding judgment to Fedmet. Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to additional damages against defendant Ekco International Trading Corp. (Ekco), pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code §§ 2-714 and 2-715.

This action arose out of a contract between Fedmet and Ekco for the sale and delivery of 6,000 metric tons of reinforced concrete steel bars (rebars). At the conclusion of a nonjury trial, I determined, inter alla,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank B. Bozzo, Inc. v. Electric Weld DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Happy Dack Trading Co., Ltd. v. Agro-Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Fertico Belgium S. A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Willred Company v. Westmoreland Metal Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Vernon v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terex Corp. v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. United States Ex Rel. Saunders Concrete Co. v. Tri-State Design Construction Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API