Greenbaum Bros. & Co. v. Megibben
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 39—PETITION EQUITY— APPEAL EROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 1 Session Acts 1869, p. 56. 20 Johns. Ch’y, 645. 5 Johns. Ch’y, 56, Bay v. Coddington. 1 Met. 628, Lee’s adm’r v. Smead & Collard. 2 Met. 534, Alexander & Co. v. Springfield Bank. 1 Duvall, 393, Thompson v. Poston. 4 Bush, 334, Pettit & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Memphis. CITED Act of March 6,1869, in reference to warehousemen’s receipts.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYOR,
delivered the opinion op the court.
Section 3 of chapter 1792, Session Acts of 1869, provides that “all warehouse receipts issued by any warehouseman as provided by this act shall be negotiable and transferable by indorsement in blank, or by special indorsement, and with like liability as bills ’of exchange now are, and with like remedy thereou.” Section 4 provides, in substance, that no warehouseman or other person shall issue any receipt or voucher for goods, wares, merchandise, produce, etc., until such goods, merchandise, produce, etc., shall have been bona fide received into…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alexander & Co. v. Springfield BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cochran v. Ripy, Hardie & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Downs v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- First National Bank v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- Hutchings v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- National Exchange Bank v. Graniteville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.