Faber v. Gimbel Bros.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 130, Jan. T., 1919, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1917, No. 1644, on a verdict for plaintiff in the case of Morris Faber v. Gimbel Brothers. Trespass for damages for personal injuries. Before Barratt, P. J. Verdict for plaintiff for $15,500, upon which judgment was entered. Errors assigned were rulings on evidence, and refusing to withdraw a juror on account of remarks of counsel.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries sustained from being run over by defendant’s motor truck. The trial resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. It is conceded the question of responsibility for the accident was one for the jury, and the only .questions discussed in this appeal relate to the measure of damages.
The facts are as follows: Plaintiff was engaged in repairing automobile radiators in partnership with another. Both members of the firm gave their entire time to the business, and together performed all repair work entrusted to them. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Seeherman v. Wilkes-Barre Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Boggess v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Kerrigan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Gilmore v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Brodie v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Boggs v. Jewell Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Defulvio v. HolstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Serhan v. BestederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.